On 8 May 2017, at 11:27 AM, Jason Schiller
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Comments in line.
...
In the absence of real data, people will often guess. Some people guess
better, some
worse. Some guesses are based on intricate algorithms, real data, and Fermi
maths,
others are just what feel right. Either type can be multiple orders of
magnitude off, or
in the right ballpark.
Do we really want to encourage data driven companies who previously requested
less IP
space then they needed because their requests have always been based on a real
measure of consumption, and not addressing speculative growth, to instead
require them
to guess about the future?
Jason -
Is there a reason that data-driven companies cannot make use of the
existing transfer
policy, and create their anticipated 24-month need based on their actual
past utilization?
I am having difficulty understanding why policy is needed specifically to
enable use of
one particular type of forward-looking projection (i.e. forecasts based on
past utilization.)
Thanks,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
