On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote: > If the 2010-6 language were removed, would that change your approach? Or is > signing the RSA the main stumbling block for you?
Hi Scott, The RSA standing alone, I'd at least put on the table. The lawyers will be vetting lots of documents; one more that requires no action beyond a signature and a token payment is no big deal. If the lawyers choked on it, I'd probably go back to plan-A but it would at least get past me to the lawyers. Regards, Bill -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
