Although I don't want to put words in people mouths. Off the top of my head
1) Equipment that is spread far and wide that needs to talk to other equipment that is spread far and wide. If every time you change an IP in 1 router you have to manually hit another dozen it gets to be a disaster very quickly. 2) Legacy apps that have addresses hard coded in them. 3) Legacy hardware that has routes and addresses hard coded in them. -Dave -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 7:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] re-org question In message <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B84593F397E@newserver.arneill-py.local>Michel Py <[email protected]> wrote: >Re-numbering is NOT an option regardless of the incentive. I don't want to distract from the point you were making, but I wonder if you might be so kind as to elaborate on the above assertion, e.g. for the benefit of those few poor ignorant sods on this list, such as myself, who might be largely or entirely ignorant of the issues and related difficulties. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
