> On Aug 16, 2016, at 18:49 , David R Huberman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I wrote: > >>> 2) In the first Public Policy Meeting this was presented, the topic of >>> "cannot meet existing policy" was mostly centered around the criterion that >>> existed of "must announce a single aggregte" into the DFZ. The presenter >>> (Joshua King) indicated this was not possible for all community network >>> implementations. >>> >>> Somewhere along the way between 2008 and today, that "announce one >>> aggregate" requirement disappeared from NRPM. > > David Farmer replied: > >> Eliminating the "announce single aggregate" requirement from IPv6 policy >> was Draft Policy 2009-7: Open Access To IPv6, spurred on by the Community >> Networks discussion if I remember correctly. 2009-7 was adopted by the >> board at the same time as 2008-3: Community Networks in December 2009, it >> almost overtook 2008-3. > > Ah! Thank you, Mr Farmer!
FWIW in 2016-6, I did not preserve the text because I felt that it no longer offered any advantages to the policy. I believe that the revised text as proposed provides all of the same benefits globally that the original text provided to a more limited set of areas. If anyone believes this is not the case or that the current text is problematic as a result, please speak up. My current hope is that we will be able to take this to Dallas as a recommended draft so that it may be adopted thereafter. Owen _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
