I support the policy as written. I also agree with staff suggestions to remove additional outdated language, but history suggests that we can only get a few words removed with each policy proposal.
I would also support removal of all needs assessment language for the transfer cases. Matthew Kaufman (Sent from my iPhone) > On May 12, 2016, at 5:46 PM, David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Matthew, Steven, Owen, and Milton, > > Since, ARIN-2015-3 is in last call, it would also be helpful if you > could comment more directly on the specific merits of or issues with > this policy, and take discussion of other more generic issues to > another thread. Furthermore, since you commented on the last call > thread for this policy, would you please clarify do your position on > that policy. Is it ready to go to the board for adoption or are there > issues that need additional work? > > Thanks. > >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:41 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: >> Folks - >> >> Please keep the discussion focused on the merits of the various policy >> positions, >> *rather than characterizations of the participants themselves) >> >> Thanks, >> /John > > > -- > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:[email protected] > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 > =============================================== _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
