On Apr 6, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Bill Buhler <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the clarification John, > > So I understand you, regarding IPv4 you are recycling the deadbeat resources > already. > > My impression though is that you aren’t doing the same with 2-byte ASN? I > think it would be good policy to begin reclamation of those resources.
We are recycling ASN’s that are returned - after the hold period we confirm that they’re not in active routing and then will reissue if someone makes an explicit request for a 2-byte ASN. > I was very grateful a few years ago to be able to get a 2-byte ASN because > one of my two upstreams stated they weren’t able to handle a 4 byte ASN, I > hope they have corrected that by now. But I understand being stuck between > the old and new and it’s nice if there are resources for those edge cases. Understood. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
