On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Gary T. Giesen <[email protected]> wrote: > While I appreciate your support of this policy, I'm a little confused about > your statement as this policy doesn't even deal with allocations of a single > /48. In fact, the current smallest prefix this policy deals with would be a > /40 (13 sites qualifies for a /40 - and in fact that number was deliberately > chosen because of that).
Hi Gary, Criteria a, b or f all justify a /48 according to NRPM 6.5.8.2 which is not modified by this policy. It's not obvious to me why c or d would necessarily qualify for more than a /48. E justifies a /40, as you said. I see what you're saying, you're only adding section E. Man, that's a really confusing way to write a policy change. The reader has to really dig to see what you're changing. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
