On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:07 PM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote: > Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1 > Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments
> Organizations may justify an initial assignment for addressing devices > directly attached to their own network infrastructure, with an intent for > the addresses to begin operational use within 12 months, by meeting one of > the following criteria: > > a. Having a previously justified IPv4 end-user assignment from ARIN or one > of its predecessor registries, or; > b. Currently being IPv6 Multihomed or immediately becoming IPv6 Multihomed > and using an assigned valid global AS number, or; > c. By having a network that makes active use of a minimum of 2000 IPv6 > addresses within 12 months, or; > d. By having a network that makes active use of a minimum of 200 /64 subnets > within 12 months, or; > e. By having a contiguous network that has a minimum of 13 active sites > within 12 months, or; > f. By providing a reasonable technical justification indicating why IPv6 > addresses from an ISP or other LIR are unsuitable. I see little difference I see between this policy and simply saying that anyone willing to pay the fee for a /48 can have one. The only notable difference is that under this policy a registrant may wish to first hire a consultant sufficiently steeped in ARIN policy language to properly phrase and exhibit his supporting documentation. I approve of this and SUPPORT the draft as written. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
