On 6/23/2015 3:55 PM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:36 PM, William Herrin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:06 PM, ARIN <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6 > Transfers and Multi-national Networks OPPOSED.Noted. Can you read over my comments below, and then note why you think it's a bad idea to ignore the geographic location where an organization is utilizing its ARIN-registered addresses when evaluating transfer requests? I'm hoping to hear the consequentialist argument behind your position, independent of the appeal to authority (of the PDP) that you gave below.Policy violates PDP section 3.2. The policy requires ARIN to consider addresses used outside the region but the PDP restricts policy scope to "number resources managed within the ARIN region."I believe that is the whole point: while these number resources may be *used* outside the ARIN region, they are still *managed* within the ARIN region (by a multinational network with meaningful business that operates in the ARIN region, and is currently using IPv4 or IPv6 addresses in the ARIN region). So I don't see a conflict with the PDP here, just a disagreement with the principle of allowing use of ARIN-issued and -managed addresses outside the ARIN region.
Makes sense to me. My management consoles rarely run in the same region where my VMs do.
Matthew Kaufman [email protected]
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
