On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Kevin Blumberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you support the substantive changes in this policy?
I support Owen's original policy with the minor tweaks to deal with the couple of things he missed. I do not support the policy as rewritten. The rewrite is, I believe, egregious and harms prospects for further policy development based on the distinction between multihomed and singlehomed. > Are there any suggestions you might have to fix the issue that doesn't leave > duplicate text in the NRPM? Intentionally leave the duplicate text in the NRPM and pursue further policy development from there. If there isn't any further policy development you can come back and collapse it in a cleanup next year. Eliminating the distinction between singlehomed and multihomed entities was not the purpose of Owen's policy proposal and is, in my opinion, a bad idea. Leave the distinction in place so that when we re-examine multihomed versus singlehomed in light of the new minimums we don't have to re-create it from the whole cloth with all the attendant trouble that will cause. Seriously, look beyond the immediate policy proposal before you consider ripping out huge chunks of the NRPM. It took a long time and a lot of debate to craft that language. Don't throw it away until we're sure we won't need it again. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
