Of course you would say that. (Smiley). You think it accelerates exhaustion. Trust me, it needs no help. Sit back and let real stakeholders define our own destiny please.
Best, -M< > On Apr 30, 2014, at 19:20, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > <sigimg0> > > > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:44:04 -0400 > From: Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> > To: John Springer <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-204 Removing Needs Test from Small > IPv4 Transfers (fwd) > Message-ID: > <camdxq5pqs-oqj8ypq+rxsevti-knqv5w5xqckguw8y+_9k_...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Not in favor. Post exhaustion perhaps. > > > To negate Mr. Hannigan's point, > > 1) it will not be an abuse vector, as it is only for transfers, not for > requests from the ARIN free pool. > > 2) There is no need to wait for exhaustion, as transfers are the same pre as > post exhaustion. > > If anything removal of needs justification prior to exhaustion will cause the > ARIN free pool to last longer. > > Sandra Brown > IPv4 Market Group > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
