On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Jason Schiller <[email protected]> wrote: > The ARIN community continues to suggest there is no hardware reason that > would prevent support of 4-byte ASNs. The community desires that we use up > the 2-byte ASNs and continue to send a message that code upgrades to support > 4-byte ASNs are now required.
Question: Large ISPs implement BGP communities with a convention of 16-bit ASN followed by 16-bits of locally defined meaning, such as set local pref to 80. Does a comparable convention exist when dealing with 32-bit ASNs? If not, what's the plan? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
