I am opposed to the rewording as the new discrete site is in itself demonstration of need. There is a technical requirement to provide at least a /24 of space at any discrete site.
Thanks, Jeff On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:16 PM, CJ Aronson <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone else have comments about this proposal? The text has been > changed slightly based on feedback from the PPC at NANOG. The change was > > from > > Upon verification that the organization has already obtained > connectivity at its new discrete network site > > to > > > Upon verification that the organization has demonstrated need at its new > discrete network site > > Please send your comments on this change and on the proposal. > > Thanks! > -----Cathy > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Andrew Dul <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I support this new version of the policy. I believe the new text >> successfully deals with the issues raised and discussed at the Atlanta >> nanog PPC. >> >> Andrew >> >> On 3/4/2014 12:13 PM, ARIN wrote: >> > ## * ## >> > >> > >> > Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2013-8 >> > Subsequent Allocations for New Multiple Discrete Networks >> > >> > Date: 4 March 2014 >> > >> > AC's assessment of conformance with the Principles of Internet Number >> > Resource Policy: >> > >> > "Subsequent Allocations for Additional Discrete Network Sites This >> > policy enables fair and impartial number resource administration by >> > documenting the current practice regarding allocations for additional >> > discrete network sites. The ARIN staff has been following a procedure >> > that has not been documented until now. By documenting this process >> > the community has clear understanding of how to get address space for >> > additional network sites. >> > >> > This is a technically sound proposal that has been in practice for >> > some time. It had just not been documented. >> > >> > This proposal has received several notes of support on the PPML and to >> > date has received no negative feedback." >> > >> > Policy Statement: >> > >> > IPv4: >> > >> > Add the following statement to section 4.5.4. >> > >> > Upon verification that the organization has demonstrated need at its new >> > discrete network site, the new networks shall be allocated the minimum >> > allocation size under section 4.2.1.5 unless the organization can >> > demonstrate additional need using the immediate need criteria (4.2.1.6). >> > >> > IPv6: >> > >> > Add an additional reference to section 6.11.5.b such that it >> > references both the initial allocation and subsequent allocation >> > sections of the IPv6 LIR policy. >> > >> > "Each network will be judged against the existing utilization criteria >> > specified in 6.5.2 and 6.5.3 as if it were a separate organization..." >> > >> > >> > >> > Comments: >> > >> > a. Timetable for implementation: immediate >> > >> > b. This policy is being proposed based upon the Policy Implementation >> > & Experience Report from ARIN 32. >> > >> > >> > https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_32/PDF/thursday/nobile-policy.pdf >> > >> > >> > c: Older versions of the MDN policy did contain new network criteria. >> > This criteria appears to have been dropped during subsequent rewrites >> > of the MDN policy. "The organization must not allocate a CIDR block >> > larger than the current minimum assignment size of the RIR (currently >> > /20 for ARIN) to a new network." >> > (https://www.arin.net/policy/archive/nrpm_20041015.pdf) >> > _______________________________________________ >> > PPML >> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. -- Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP Fellow, Black Lotus Communications mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: [email protected] | skype: blacklotus.net _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
