On 9/17/13 10:20 , Matthew Petach wrote:

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:59 PM, David Farmer <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 9/14/13 22:58 , Matthew Petach wrote:

....
        I will also note for the record that as port density increases,
        the number of devices we use is going down, not up.

        They cost a metric shit ton more, and suck up more power
        and need more cooling--but if you're measuring by "number
        of boxes" rather than "capability of boxes", I think the expectation
        that the number of boxes in a network will always be increasing,
        as someone else further down in the thread claimed, is prima
        facie false.


    I don't think we want to be measuring the size of the network, at
    least the number of devices used to build the network.  Just that
    there is a network, or portion of a global network, within the region.



OK; so "20%" could be measured in terms of cost of devices in the
ARIN region, rather than device count, in the case of a network
that has a few very large, very expensive network elements in
the ARIN region, but hundreds of small, inexpensive nodes
outside of the ARIN region.

If we change to a 20% standard, then substitute 20% for plurality below, but I'll use plurality for now;

It is plurality of the resources requested and where the things that justify those resources are located. If one device in the ARIN region, is part of a global network of a million other devices, but that device justifies the need for a plurality of the new requested resources, based on the other applicable policies and procedures then you've meet the standard.

This isn't about counting infrastructure, there just needs to be infrastructure to justify the request, just like today. This isn't necessarily about counting customers either, if the fact that you are adding 10,000 home broadband users and you are justifying 1 address per customer, then sure the count of the customers in or out of the region matters in that case. This isn't intended to add anything new other than where the things are that are use to justify your request. Its the count of the resources justified that matters, not necessarily the count of the things justifying.

If today you justify your request because you are adding 10,000 servers to your network and also 10,000 virtual hosting web sites with SSL, for a total of 20,000 addresses. Then if the 10,000 virtual hosts are based in the ARIN region, and the 10,000 servers are not all in one of the other regions then you meet the standard for a plurality of the resources requested being justified within the ARIN region. Also, note the 10,000 virtual sites with SSL could in theory be one server in the ARIN region.

This isn't as hard as some people seem to want to make it. You simply add one fact to the information that you have to give ARIN now, where the things justifying resources are located. I believe, in most cases you end up giving them that anyway.

Thanks

--
================================================
David Farmer               Email: [email protected]
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to