Hi Ralf,
> the thread is from April.
It arrived here today. Here's a summary of the Received fields.
It seems the ‘131d’ delay was within archlinux.org.
Tue 15 Apr 2025
03:04:38 +00:00:00 from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix)
with ESMTPSA
id 4Zc6sy3c2qzFs33
for <[email protected]>
+00:00:00 from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net
[10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix)
with ESMTPS
id 4Zc6sy73yMzDrk6
for <[email protected]>
03:04:44 +00:00:06 from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net
[198.252.153.129])
by lists.archlinux.org (Postfix)
with ESMTPS
id AEABA4CE2CC8
for <[email protected]>
Sun 24 Aug
18:55:50 +15:51:12+131d from [95.217.236.249] (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by lists.archlinux.org (Postfix)
with ESMTP
id 380855A491BE
18:55:58 +15:51:20+131d from lists.archlinux.org (lists.archlinux.org
[IPv6:2a01:4f9:c010:9eb4::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)
server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
by mailwash54.pair.com (Postfix)
with ESMTPS
id C944D164952
for <[email protected]>
--
Cheers, Ralph.
