On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 17:26, Ralf Mardorf <ralf-mard...@riseup.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 11:55 -0400, Genes Lists wrote: > > perhaps someone else might be willing to tackle the aur. > > Let alone that the AUR also provides outdated software, because it is > outdated. > > case in point. manual marking requires manual. but a scanner's report every now and then?
