Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2014 10:10:34 +0800 with message-id <CAN3veRfs+H=skknzqedzc0zlmsxtm3lh2y6wlspsp3m_idr...@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Re: Bug#746995: aptitude upgrade is inconsistent (UI vs command line) has caused the Debian Bug report #746995, regarding aptitude upgrade is inconsistent (UI vs command line) to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 746995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746995 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.10-1 Severity: normal With an upgrade from the UI (key U), aptitude wants to remove sysvinit-core by default: Actions Undo Package Resolver Search Options Views Help C-T: Menu ?: Help q: Quit u: Update g: Download/Install/Remove Pkgs Packages Preview aptitude 0.6.10 Will free 67.6 kB of disk spac DL Size: 296 kB --\ Packages being automatically held in their current state (1) iFA python-pil 2.2.1-3 2.3.0-2 --\ Packages being automatically installed to satisfy dependencies (2) piA libpam-systemd +118 kB <none> 204-10 piA systemd-sysv +67.6 kB <none> 204-10 --\ Packages being deleted due to unsatisfied dependencies (1) idA sysvinit-core -252 kB 2.88dsf-53 2.88dsf-53 --\ Packages being held back (4) iF fvwm 1:2.5.30.ds-1.1+local1 1:2.6.5.ds-3 iF gthumb 3:3.2.6-1+b1 3:3.3.1-2 iF gthumb-data 3:3.2.6-1 3:3.3.1-2 iF python-imaging 2.2.1-3 2.3.0-2 --\ Packages to be upgraded (6) iu gir1.2-polkit-1. 0.105-4 0.105-5 iu libpolkit-agent- 0.105-4 0.105-5 iu libpolkit-backen 0.105-4 0.105-5 iu libpolkit-gobjec 0.105-4 0.105-5 iu libpolkit-gobjec -1,024 B 0.105-4 0.105-5 iu policykit-1 0.105-4 0.105-5 but with "aptitude upgrade" from the command line, everything is fine: # aptitude upgrade Resolving dependencies... The following NEW packages will be installed: libpam-systemd{a} systemd-shim{a} The following packages will be upgraded: gir1.2-polkit-1.0 libpolkit-agent-1-0 libpolkit-backend-1-0 libpolkit-gobject-1-0 libpolkit-gobject-1-dev policykit-1 6 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded. Need to get 285 kB of archives. After unpacking 211 kB will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] -- Package-specific info: Terminal: xterm-debian $DISPLAY is set. which aptitude: /usr/bin/aptitude aptitude version information: aptitude 0.6.10 compiled at Feb 20 2014 17:26:22 Compiler: g++ 4.8.2 Compiled against: apt version 4.12.0 NCurses version 5.9 libsigc++ version: 2.2.11 Ept support enabled. Gtk+ support disabled. Qt support disabled. Current library versions: NCurses version: ncurses 5.9.20140118 cwidget version: 0.5.17 Apt version: 4.12.0 aptitude linkage: linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff45ae2000) libapt-pkg.so.4.12 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.4.12 (0x00007f2673dfa000) libncursesw.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libncursesw.so.5 (0x00007f2673bc5000) libtinfo.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.5 (0x00007f267399a000) libsigc-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsigc-2.0.so.0 (0x00007f2673795000) libcwidget.so.3 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcwidget.so.3 (0x00007f267348e000) libept.so.1.aptpkg4.12 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libept.so.1.aptpkg4.12 (0x00007f2673231000) libxapian.so.22 => /usr/lib/libxapian.so.22 (0x00007f2672e33000) libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007f2672c1b000) libsqlite3.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0 (0x00007f267295e000) libboost_iostreams.so.1.54.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_iostreams.so.1.54.0 (0x00007f2672744000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f2672527000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f267221b000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f2671f18000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f2671d02000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f2671957000) libutil.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f2671754000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f2671550000) libbz2.so.1.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbz2.so.1.0 (0x00007f267133f000) liblzma.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblzma.so.5 (0x00007f267111c000) libuuid.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007f2670f16000) librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f2670d0e000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f2674792000) -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages aptitude depends on: ii aptitude-common 0.6.10-1 ii libapt-pkg4.12 1.0.2 ii libboost-iostreams1.54.0 1.54.0-5 ii libc6 2.18-5 ii libcwidget3 0.5.17-1 ii libept1.4.12 1.0.12 ii libgcc1 1:4.9.0-2 ii libncursesw5 5.9+20140118-1 ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.2.11-3 ii libsqlite3-0 3.8.4.3-2 ii libstdc++6 4.9.0-2 ii libtinfo5 5.9+20140118-1 ii libxapian22 1.2.17-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 Versions of packages aptitude recommends: ii apt-xapian-index 0.46 ii aptitude-doc-en [aptitude-doc] 0.6.10-1 ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-1 ii sensible-utils 0.0.9 Versions of packages aptitude suggests: pn debtags <none> ii tasksel 3.20 -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hello On 5 May 2014 01:25, Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> wrote: > Package: aptitude > Version: 0.6.10-1 > Severity: normal > > With an upgrade from the UI (key U), aptitude wants to remove > sysvinit-core by default: > > but with "aptitude upgrade" from the command line, everything is fine: > The curses and command line interfaces are not equivalent. The curses interface provides more detailed feedback and perhaps greater opportunity for the user to browse the proposed set of actions, and for this reason is less conservative when making changes. Thanks
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
