On 8/12/24 09:55, John Johansen wrote:
On 8/8/24 08:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
policy_unpack_test fails on big endian systems because data byte order
is expected to be little endian but is generated in host byte order.
This results in test failures such as:
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at
security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:150
Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
(u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0
total:1
not ok 3 policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at
security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:164
Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
(u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
Add the missing endianness conversions when generating test data.
Fixes: 4d944bcd4e73 ("apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack")
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhigg...@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
Looks good
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johan...@canonical.com>
I will pull this into my tree
Thanks!
Guenter
