On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:38:08AM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2012 schrieb John Johansen:
> > right, though I don't have a strong objection to it going into 2.7
> > either. I won't deny they could be useful, and the one could even be
> > considered a bug fix, but the bug is minor and only leads to an extra
> > step in creating a profile. 
> 
> I would call both patches bugfixes. They fix the "genprof asks 
> superfluous and obvious questions" usability bug ;-) and also keep the 
> audit.log smaller (= better genprof performance) because everything in 
> the abstractions doesn't need to be logged.
> 
> > We certainly have pushed some features
> > into point releases in the past. Basically if this is something you
> > would really like to see in the point release its worth considering.
> 
> It's not a killer feature/bugfix, but nevertheless it's a bugfix. 
> In other words:
> 
> for both patches:
> Acked-by: Christian Boltz <[email protected]> for the 2.7 branch

Thanks, I went ahead and merged both commits to the 2.7 branch based
on your feedback.

-- 
Steve Beattie
<[email protected]>
http://NxNW.org/~steve/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to