Add the ability to match strings directly from the hfa instead of needing
to build a cfha.

Signed-off-by: John Johansen <[email protected]>
---
 parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.cc |   14 ++++++++++++++
 parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.h  |   10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.cc b/parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.cc
index 5e2898f..86e5bd5 100644
--- a/parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.cc
+++ b/parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.cc
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 #include <ostream>
 #include <iostream>
 #include <fstream>
+#include <string.h>
 
 #include "expr-tree.h"
 #include "hfa.h"
@@ -267,6 +268,19 @@ DFA::~DFA()
                delete *i;
 }
 
+State *DFA::match_len(State *state, const char *str, size_t len)
+{
+       for (; len > 0; ++str, --len)
+               state = state->next(*str);
+
+       return state;
+}
+
+State *DFA::match(const char *str)
+{
+       return match_len(start, str, strlen(str));
+}
+
 void DFA::dump_uniq_perms(const char *s)
 {
        set<pair<uint32_t, uint32_t> > uniq;
diff --git a/parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.h b/parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.h
index 161cddd..3e8d99b 100644
--- a/parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.h
+++ b/parser/libapparmor_re/hfa.h
@@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ public:
                }
        };
 
+       State *next(uchar c) {
+               StateTrans::iterator i = trans.find(c);
+               if (i != trans.end())
+                       return i->second;
+               return otherwise;
+       };
+
        int label;
        uint32_t audit, accept;
        StateTrans trans;
@@ -341,6 +348,9 @@ public:
        DFA(Node *root, dfaflags_t flags);
        virtual ~DFA();
 
+       State *match_len(State *state, const char *str, size_t len);
+       State *match(const char *str);
+
        void remove_unreachable(dfaflags_t flags);
        bool same_mappings(State *s1, State *s2);
        size_t hash_trans(State *s);
-- 
1.7.7.3


-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to