Moin, On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 02:37:27PM -0700, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Sure, but that's a membership decision and not a community decision. this perceived disconnect is a re-occuring scheme and therefore deserves a bit more thought, albeit not in this WG but likely in NCC Services and/or Address Policy as well as within the membership. If (or "iff" for the formal reader) policy is helped by economic incentives or counter-incentives, then it could be a good thing to have a way of (conditional) policy making to solve the deadlock without stepping on each others' toes. Not saying that's a solution for the case that started this threat, also recognizing the emotional aspect of fee scheme decisions. -Peter -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
