Hi,

I’m out of office till 22 August. Any RIPE Labs related queries can be sent to 
l...@ripe.net and one of my colleagues will get back to you.

Cheers,
Alun

On 13 Aug 2022, at 16:47, Hans-Martin Mosner via anti-abuse-wg 
<anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> wrote:

> Am 13.08.22 um 14:13 schrieb jer...@hackersbescherming.nl:
> I would say perfect for that anti abuse training!
> 
> Training is useful if you want to learn and achieve the training subject 
> matter. Serverius (like many other hosting/colocation providers) is in the 
> business of deflecting trouble from their customers. In an old antispam forum 
> post I found this quote without exact source, which could be used verbatim by 
> most of them:
> 
> Serverius IT infrastructure is providing underlying infrastructure services 
> without any hosting activities. Serverius is not a hosting provider as it has 
> no data carrier hardware like servers or disk storage services under 
> management (only our clients do). Serverius is only providing the parent data 
> center colocation of client hardware and/or IP connectivity services that are 
> used by clients to build their own infrastructure. Their services are used by 
> millions of companies in the world. Therefore Serverius does not know what 
> Serverius network users are hosting (it's technically impossible for us to 
> see and forbidden by law) and Serverius is therefore not liable for what our 
> customer hosts behind its own network and/or on his own infrastructure. 
> Legally, they may be right (of course they are not allowed to peek into their 
> customer's servers). However, there's something more to it - you could have 
> contract and AUP clauses which prohibit spamming/abuse and give the provider 
> leverage to enforce that prohibition. But some providers apparently prefer to 
> keep such clauses out of their contracts and don't want to waste money on 
> abuse desk training because a well-paying customer is a well-paying customer 
> after all. "Pecunia non olet", as Vespasian is reported to have said.
> 
> Those are not the target group for anti abuse training. They would probably 
> need it, but first they would need the will to stop network abuse emanating 
> from their infrastructure.
> 
> Cheers,
> Hans-Martin
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change 
> your subscription options, please visit: 
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg

Reply via email to