On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 11:56:58AM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
In a case where the community is polarised to this extent it would be better to
break with procedure and call a vote for once. With member organizations
represented by their abuse team heads, rather than IP / routing people, so that
the organisation?s stance on this is clear.
In the words of Lord Hoffman: " I find it difficult to express
with appropriate moderation my disagreement with the proposition"
Not only do you propose the abolition of the PDP, you want to
also limit the "electorate" to such as are more likely to be
sympathetic to your cause.
I don't even know how to respond to this without invoking
Godwin's Law or similar, so I'll stop here.
rgds,
Sascha Luck
From: Gert Doering <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, 9 May 2020 at 3:57 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <[email protected]>
Cc: Randy Bush <[email protected]>, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]>,
[email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of
"abuse-mailbox")
Hi,
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 01:12:32AM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Has this even been put to a vote or is it the same group of extremely vocal
RIPE regulars against it and the same group of extremely vocal security types
for it? Rough consensus has its limitations in such cases.
There is no voting.
It's either "there is sufficient support and counterarguments have been
adequately addressed" or "no consensus, rewrite or withdraw".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
