Hi all, Here's a heads-up: I made a PR for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy to close 2 remaining major issues.
#45<https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-join-proxy/issues/45> What should a join proxy do when it has access to multiple registrars? #65<https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-join-proxy/issues/65> Registrar aliveness problem and text Plan is to merge this by Saturday, so it can be present within the I-D by the time of IETF 123, for review/discussion. Any changes/proposals before Saturday are still welcome! The PR is here: https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-join-proxy/pull/76 There are multiple solutions possible to the stated issues. I tried to apply the solution that is 1. aligned to RFC 8995 — responsibility of the Pledge for doing Join Proxy selection and monitoring the progress 2. aligned to the BRSKI-discovery draft - upcoming work. regards, Esko
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
