Mike Bishop via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Appendix A.2 defines the culinary term "parboiled" and references its
> use in RFC 8995. It appears that while 8995 uses it in the filename of
> one example, it does not use the term to define any portion of the
> protocol, nor does this document. If its use is widespread among
> implementers and it is useful/necessary to know, elevate it to a
Yeah, it was a term I tried to introduce, but in the end the WG went with
Registrar Voucher Request. parboiled things are half-baked, and need to be
further processed.
I didn't know it survived into this document.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
