Hi Michael, Yes, indeed, the text looks smoother. I merged the PR, but will wait until end of this week to push an updated version to the IETF. Just to be sure. As the changes are purely editorial it should be fine.
Best regards Steffen > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 8:00 PM > To: Fries, Steffen (FT RPD CST) <steffen.fr...@siemens.com> > Cc: anima <anima@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Anima] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm- > 22.txt > > > Fries, Steffen <steffen.fries=40siemens....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > - includes clarification > > regarding TLS 1.2 use in Section 4.1 > > Looking at the diff... > The working in two sentences was poor, redid those sentences as > https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/pull/150 > Does not change anything significant. > > > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
