Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> I'd like to hear who is in favor as well.

    >> It might be useful to provide something concrete to review... a PR, or
    >> a diff, or something.

    > Like:

    mcr> You want more text than Toerless offered?
    mcr> https://github.com/lamps-wg/lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs/pull/59/files


## Update to RFC9148

The updates to EST in this document equally apply when using
CoAP as a transport as described in {{!RFC9148}}.
This document therefore adds the following paragraph after the second paragraph
of {{RFC9148, Section 1}}:

<aside markdown="block">
RFC EDITOR: Please replace THISRFC with the RFC number for this document.
</aside>

```
EST over CoAP as specified in {{!RFC9148}} applies unchanged
to {{!RFC7030}} updated by THISRFC.
Hence, all references to {{RFC7030}} in {{!RFC9148}} are assumed to indicate
{{RFC7030}} updated by THISRFC.
```

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to