Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd like to hear who is in favor as well.
>> It might be useful to provide something concrete to review... a PR, or >> a diff, or something. > Like: mcr> You want more text than Toerless offered? mcr> https://github.com/lamps-wg/lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs/pull/59/files ## Update to RFC9148 The updates to EST in this document equally apply when using CoAP as a transport as described in {{!RFC9148}}. This document therefore adds the following paragraph after the second paragraph of {{RFC9148, Section 1}}: <aside markdown="block"> RFC EDITOR: Please replace THISRFC with the RFC number for this document. </aside> ``` EST over CoAP as specified in {{!RFC9148}} applies unchanged to {{!RFC7030}} updated by THISRFC. Hence, all references to {{RFC7030}} in {{!RFC9148}} are assumed to indicate {{RFC7030}} updated by THISRFC. ``` _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org