Dear ANIMA WG enthusiasts
This email starts a three-week adoption call for drafts
draft-richardson-anima-masa-considerations
draft-richardson-anima-registrar-considerations
The timeline is longer than the usual two weeks because it is two drafts
(and we also want to ask for other adoptions in parallel).
THese two drafts have been updated by the authors repeatedly following
track with operational considerations related to ongoing BRSKI specification/
deployment work:
These two drafts collect operational considerations that often came out
of work on working on BRSKI protocol specifications and implementation
experience. Having them as official part of our work should help making it
easier to avoid discussing operational considerations across other BRSKI
specs in those specs.
When you support this adoption, it would be good to know if you have an
opinion whether these drafts should be merged ("BRSKI operational
considerations"),
or if they should stay separate (MASA vs Registrar).
Another important aspect is target status of Best Current Practice or
Informational. Please tell us your opinion.
---
Toerless Eckert (for the chairs)
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
