Reviewer: David Lawrence Review result: Ready with Nits For the DNS Directorate, I have focused my review on the DNS-salient aspects of the draft.
The core protocol use of DNS-SD looks spot-on, so no issues there. This draft does a callout to RFC 8995 for core definitions, which does fortunately include a definition of "Domain" that makes it clear that it isn't talking only about a domain name in the common DNS sense. However, neither 8995's Terminology section nor the one here define Domain Registrar, and given that it is a reasonably common term on the Internet for which people will have a preconceived notion of its meaning, it'd be good to identify in Terminology here not only what it does mean, but to explicitly acknowledge that it is not a DNS registrar. Section 10.2 for IANA is titled "DNS Service Names" but fails to mention where IANA is registering this information. I believe you mean the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry, which is not a DNS Service Name registry. Please add the registry name in the section, and delete DNS from the section title. I've noted that a number of other reviews have already covered matters of proofreading, and rather than attempt to de-duplicate the minor errors I also saw, I've instead trusted that they were all already covered. _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
