Hi Michael, Thank you for the repost. I was not quite sure if we can call for adoption when the drafts are expired, hence the proposal to edit first. But I agree, as this is a viable problem to solve, we could go with the adoption first. I would be in favor. I will review both documents and provide comments/input.
Best regards Steffen > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 9:25 PM > To: Fries, Steffen (FT RPD CST) <steffen.fr...@siemens.com>; anima@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Anima] Re: BRSKI Operational Consideration > > > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > >> * Registrar: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-anima-registrar- > considerations/ > >> * MASA: > >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-anima-masa-considerations/ > > > I'm very pleased to revise these document. > > I have reposted the I-Ds. > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
