Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Francesca's DISCUSS. Moreover, I have the following observations about the media type registration: (a) For "Required parameters" and "Optional parameters", you very likely want "N/A", not "None". See RFC 6838, Section 5.6. (b) I don't think the text you have for "Interoperability considerations" is exactly what the template wants. See the discussion in RFC 6838, Section 6.2. I don't understand the SHOULDs in Section 3.2. Why aren't they MUSTs? Is there ever a legitimate reason not to do what it says? _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
