Hi, As we are currently revising RFC 8366 I've got a question regarding the definition of leafs in the voucher. In the current version of the voucher definition there is no leaf, which allows to provide additional (vendor specific) values to the pledge. Would it make sense to allow this extensibility by providing an optional opaque leaf for this? Background for the question is that we are currently discussing a migration path from an existing onboarding approach to BRSKI support. Having at least the option to provide additional values may ease the switch to BRSKI by keeping information in the voucher, which is currently used in addition.
Best regards Steffen -- Steffen Fries Siemens AG
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
