Matthias Kovatsch <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> Seeing the artart review by Jim Fenton, I felt inspired to improve some
> things given my recent work on the BRSKI-PRM draft. This PR should
> address all comments except the question, why it is not part of
> 8366bis.
My take on this is that:
1) we've put one signature format per document, which makes review easier.
This also makes it easier to say what specification is required.
2) jws in theory can apply to 8366, but the argument to merge it all is
understood.
3) I'd consider removing CMS from 8366bis :-)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
