Thanks for your feedback, Eliot! With respect to the examples nits, the focus of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher is on voucher objects. More concrete use cases should be described in other specifications, e.g., draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm
Best regards Thomas Von: Eliot Lear via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> Datum: Montag, 16. September 2024 um 10:50 An: iot-director...@ietf.org <iot-director...@ietf.org> Cc: anima@ietf.org <anima@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher....@ietf.org <draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher....@ietf.org>, last-c...@ietf.org <last-c...@ietf.org> Betreff: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12 Reviewer: Eliot Lear Review result: Ready with Nits This draft describes a JWS-protected RFC-8366 voucher. It is well written and clear. Major issues: None. Minor issues: None. Nits: I would prefer a more complete test vector in the examples. That is, could you provide the inputs that produced them?
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
