I did check just now - the review comments were addressed. I added a few new text issues in the issue tracker #42 to #46 (https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues) and a request to change one more item for #32. This is based on reading the new text and re-reading the old. These are things I feel that the WG needs to fix before proceeding with the document, to avoid reviewer's confusion further down the line.
Overall, I also found there's still many typos and word omissions that could be fixed before moving this document forward to IESG. Not sure if that's needed (we can apply the lazy-fix policy and let IESG find them ;-) ) I could also send a PR with fixes but that might delay the process. Let me know if this PR is desired or not! Esko -----Original Message----- From: Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 19:50 To: Esko Dijk <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Esko: Re: [Anima] Moving draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-06 forward Esko: I was just checking -07, it looks as if your open review concerns should have been successfully answered. Would you mind acknowledging, please ?! Thanks Toerless On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:58:22PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Owen Friel \(ofriel\) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Esko, I just merged a PR to address these: > > https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/40 Thanks, Owen > > now posted -07: > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-06&url2=draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-07&difftype=--html > > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
