Dangjuanna <dangjua...@huawei.com> wrote:
    mcr> 1) do the ANS message flow over the ACP?  I assume so.
    JD> Correct. ACP of the autonomic node send or receive the ANS message. I
    JD> was a little hesitant to use the SPE and UPE names when writing, so
    JD> the text was a little confusing. I suggest that the SPE and UPE be
    JD> unified as an SPE in the future because it is a single device on the
    JD> network. Do you think it is OK?

I don't know if you should combine SPE/UPE/PE.  I don't know enough about
this area of traffic engineering.

    mcr> I think you want to do an IANA Action here to define your own?
    mcr> EX10 is just... an example.
    JD> Yes, the new objective-name for network service deployment need to be
    JD> defined and added. EX10 is only one example :)

I suggest you pick a name, and put it into the IANA considerations.

    > path-identification-value, resource-type, same comment.

    JD> Could you help me modify them according to your understanding?

Probably, just don't be so specific about the values.
I think that "object-value" can be any amount of CDDL that want to write.
You could use a map for "service-identification"

Since it's all encoded in CBOR, you can't have a 3-bit value, only a 1-byte 
value.

    > You probably mean to say that it uses the security provided by the ACP.
    JD> Yes, do you think whether it is enough?

Yes, I think it is, but you need to say so, and explain what threads there
are, and why the ACP provides an acceptable solution.

    > Then the ANS communication would occur with that discovered node.
    > It would, as you say, negotiate the path.

    JD> Correct, this process is necessary in the entire program. But in the
    JD> network service auto-deployment scenario, this discovery mechanism
    JD> has not been changed, so I did not emphasize it in the text. Where do
    JD> you think it is more appropriate to add it?

I think that you need to explain more of it.

    > I don't know [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing] or [I-D.ietf-mpls] that
    > well, but I didn't think that they included on-path (RSVP-like)
    > discovery of route.
    > Probably, I've missed something.

    JD> The routing protocol can advertise routes and calculate the optimal
    JD> route, which I understand should be regarded as a route discovery
    JD> process. I also would like to hear more of your thoughts on this
    JD> point.

I don't have the background in traffic engineering to know.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to