Based on this exchange, and the arguments presented here that I observed so far, I'm with Randy. I have not seen adequate answers to his concerns (which IMHO are reasonable).
P.S. Feel free to trim the CC: list when/if responding. P.P.S. In one of my prior incarnations many years ago, we designed a somewhat similar system, and called it "Zero-Touch Provisioning". It was a very big company, so we did not consider the possibility of it/us going out of business (and leaving the customers stranded). But if Randy's arguments were presented to our team then, we'd probably accepted them and tried to address... Sent from my test iPhone On Oct 2, 2018, at 20:53, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think it's been thought through but badly articulated. In that sense, >> the Last Call is doing its job. > > does that mean that i can stop trying for a narten medal, go back to > work, and christian will wake me up again when my two scenarios have > clear answers; one hopes ones with which i can live? > > also, please tell me that i do not need to stick my nose into the rest > of anima in order to let the user unequivocally own what they buy. i > have my own rabbit holes to pursue in the ietf. > > randy > > _______________________________________________ > secdir mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir > wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
