Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >> SHOULD ietf-core-sid say something about this?
> Yes, we should have a common way of handling SID allocations in RFCs.
It's not just allocations, but presentation.
> draft-ietf-core-sid sounds like a natural way to place this, but what
> goes into what document is often a question of who has time to write
> something at a particular point in time. So let’s discuss this with
> the authors.
agreed.
> In any case, this probably should stay at the level of a suggestion
> more than prescribing a normative way of doing things — the conventions
> we use for this may evolve faster than the rest of the technical
> content of draft-ietf-core-sid.
I don't want a prescription either, but rather a BCP that evolves.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
