Liang: Just posted draft version -17 does include the fix from
your review i missed to put into -16.
Thanks!
Toerless
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:28:05PM -0800, Liang Xia wrote:
> Reviewer: Liang Xia
> Review result: Has Issues
>
> In general, this document is well-written and considers security issues
> carefully throughout the whole architecture.
>
> nits:
> Abstract: /or not misconfigured/or misconfigured/
>
> the fifth paragraph of section 6.1: the last ")" is redundant, therefore can
> be
> deleted
>
> some section titles don't comply the rule of starting from a capital letter
>
> section 6.5
> /("IP security", see [RFC4301] and "Internet Key Exchange protocol version 2",
> see [RFC7296]/("IP security", see [RFC4301] and "Internet Key Exchange
> protocol
> version 2", see [RFC7296])/
>
> suggestion:
> all the Figures (e.g., Figure 1,2...) should have a title for explanation
>
> section 2, please update the last paragraph to reference RFC8174 to indicate
> that lowercase versions of the keywords are not normative
>
> Section 11 (Security Considerations) Since section 9.2 has described the
> self-protection properties of ACP well, it may be useful in this section to
> mention them as a whole.
--
---
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
