On 26/07/2018 05:39, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Just watching the recording...
>
> Like Toerless, I am not sure what you are proposing to do exactly.
> How does what we need to do differ from what MIF (failed?) to do?
Well, MIF did produce PVDs, but IMHO that was a completely different
problem space. I think the correct question is how does the problem
differ from the one solved by BRSKI+ACP, plus the missing bit of
Anima, which is how to identify roles within the ANI and where the
edge of the autonomic domain is. Our feeling is that this is a more
general concept than just autonomics.
(For example: Segment routing assumes that we know where the SR
domain edge is. DETNET assumes that we know where the domain edge
is. Diffserv assumes the same thing. Up to know, we only know
because we configure the interior and edge nodes explicitly.)
> I was hoping that the ID would tell me more, but it didn't manage that yet.
OK, we'll try harder ;-). I will be giving these ideas a run at greater
length at the APAN research workshop in Auckland on August 6th.
> (When you say, which "node" is a member of the domain, I think you mean to
> say, "which interface on a node" is a member of the domain... ?)
I think that depends on the scenario. (Do you think that
individual interfaces should have an IDevID?)
Thanks
Brian
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
