Hi, Brian, Thanks for your carefully checking. I prefer to keep 2a and cut item 7 to be two drafts, giving they are in different stages for WG concern. I have shorten both presentation time as you suggested. You may consider to ask WG adoption, while I am hoping we will have new charter text soon.
Best regards, Sheng -----Original Message----- From: Anima [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 11:19 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Liubing (Leo) <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Anima] Primary ANIMA Agenda for IETF102 Hi Sheng, My suggestion was to combine draft-ietf-anima-grasp-api, draft-carpenter-anima-asa-guidelines and draft-carpenter-anima-grasp-bulk, in one (quick) presentation, to save time. That is item 7, except that only one draft is linked. We need only one slide per draft, because there is little change. But item 7 overlaps with item 2a. Please let us know what you prefer. Brian On 09/07/2018 14:54, Sheng Jiang wrote: > Hi, ANIMA, > > The below is the link to our primary ANIMA agenda. It is a subject to be > changed. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/agenda-102-anima-00 > > Please no hesitate to contact the chair for any miss or mistake. > > Regards, > > Sheng > > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
