(not sure which hat i should wear for this email ... i guess it mostly my personal opinion):
Michael (dear editor) One nit fix suggestion for whenever you'll do a rev because of IESG feedback: I have just noticed that some tooling, at least from Jari (http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats) is also taking contributors into account when listing RFCs. Datatracker does not (yet) do this, but i want to suggest it to them given how i feel that its valuable to more explicitly givecredit to the contributor status (aka: list RFCs someone contributed to on their datatracker personal page). Wrt. to the anima reference model: If would be good if you could put the email address of each contributor in parenthesis behind the contributors name. This should help any parsing tool trying to identify/ match contributors. Also, please move the contributors section before the Acknowledgements section - unless you disagree that thats the more appropriate order. Thanks! toerless _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
