Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote:
    > the last-call comment from me about the only mayor issue, which was how to
    > make GRASP announcemments for IP-in-IP work. As said in before, any
    > solution that works is fine. Including moving IP-in-IP out to another
    > doc.

1) We removed all references to IPPROTO_IPV6 from the normative text,
   and also the IPPROTO_UDP, since CoAP version is another draft.

2) We used the //= notation to make it clear that transport-proto
   was an extension point.  We also threw in the $...

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to