On 20/06/2018 03:29, Michael Richardson wrote:
> On 19/06/18 11:08 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> From our document:
>>
>> transport-proto /= IPPROTO_TCP ; note this is an extensible CDDL choice
>> ; and can be added to in subsequent
>> ; specifications using the /= and //=
> In further discussion about whether or not we now need an IANA registry
> in BRSKI to deal with this, we concluded that we did not, because GRASP
> already dealt with that in section 2.9.5.1, note 3, so we decided to
> refer to that instead:
>
> transport-proto /= IPPROTO_TCP ; note this can be any value from the
> ; IANA protocol registry, as per
> ; [GRASP] section 2.9.5.1, note 3.
>
>
> We have also removed all referenced to IPPROTO_UDP and IPPROTO_IPV6 from
> the normative section.
That's a great solution; and as "note 3" says we can always add an
IANA registry if we want values outside 0..255 for some reason.
(It's an obvious convention to use the same symbolic names as
the socket API, but that doesn't seem necessary to state.)
Brian
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
