Hi Sheng,
Not that many actual new draft/work-items, but lots of activity going
on, hee's what's on my contributor plate:
1. draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control plane
5 min IESG review update
2. draft-eckert-anima-grasp-dnssd
<= 10 mins ?
Update of feedback from DNS-SD WG @ IETF100 (happened after ANIMA@IETF100)
and summary of implementation status from Brian.
Want to ask for ANIMA WG adoption (in-charter, details that fell off
BRSKI/ACP).
3. I also have a personal problem, but maybe if Max chimes in and can help,
maybe this can also be a slot to discuss:
I did contribute text about ANI/BRSKI to draft-nir-saag-star-01
(just check difference between the -00 version, eas to identify the ANI text),
outlining how ANI itself can benefit from short-lived certificates, but
also how ANI could be a great infra to manage short-lived certificates.
This was targeted for SAAG, but it ended up on tuesday, probably
9:50 - 10:10 time slot in SECDISPATCH.
If Max could go to secdispatch, and represent BRSKI/EST/ANI,
that would be great, otherwise i would ask for 15 mins off from
anima for myself.
Maybe we can have at the end of the anima schedule a short slot
to discuss possible extensions for short-lived certificates, e.g.:
what would need to be defined on a standards doc. And whether or not
this should be in ANIMA.
4. I did not manage to finish a -00 draft, but would very much like to
find co-authors for a Yang model for ANI, so if there is anyone here
interredsted in this, pls. ping me offline.
5. Alas, probably no RFC for ANIMA to report until IETF101.
draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity would have no dependencies to wait
for, but its in RFC editor queue for 4 weeks, without feedback yet.
As far as i was told, this is unfortunately normal before the spring meeting
with all the leaving ADs prioritizing the stuff they wanted to get finished
in the RFC editor queue, so wait time for RFC editor resources in this
time slot is particularily long. (Voucher might be further along, but
would have BRSKI dependency to wait for).
Cheers
Toerless
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:56:34AM +0000, Sheng Jiang wrote:
> Hi, all anima,
>
>
>
> We have been allocated a session of 2.5-hour for the ANIMA WG meeting for
> IETF-101 (London) and are starting to collect agenda items for the session.
> Please send your request for agenda by March 8th, Thursday.
>
>
>
> Giving that most of our chartered work items have been sent to IESG for
> publication by the meeting, we expect short time slots for only two or three
> of them. For this coming meeting, we would like to discuss potential future
> ANIMA works.
>
>
>
> As normal, the priority among these non-charter work items would be: these
> that have active discussion in mail list, then these have submitted drafts,
> and topics without drafts.
>
>
>
> Please send us (anima-chairs at
> ietf.org<https://ietf.org/><http://ietf.org%3Chttps/ietf.org/%3E)>;) requests
> for time slot by March 8th, Thursday and include:
>
> Name of time slot:
>
> Name of draft(s):
>
> Time requested:
>
> Presenter name(s):
>
>
>
> More details about the IETF 101, London can be found at:
>
>
>
> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/101/index.html
>
>
>
> Again, presenters and draft authors please invoke active discussions in the
> ANIMA list. Mail list is a very good place to discuss and reach consensus on
> technical issues.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Toerless & Sheng
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
--
---
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
