Hi, WG. I'm the designated expert reviewer for GRASP Object Names. IANA asked me to look at autonomic-control-plane. What fun!
I had NO problems with AN_ACP or SRV.est, but the following paragraph surprised me: > Note that the objective format "SRV.<service-name>" is intended to be > used for any <service-name> that is an [RFC6335] registered service > name. This is a proposed update to the GRASP registry subject to > future work and only mentioned here for informational purposed to > explain the unique format of the objective name. I think that if we want to reserve SRV.* for RFC6335 services, then we should do exactly that. The ship hasn't quite sailed on GRASP-15, because it's in gonna be in MISREF on a bunch of other documents. It could be done in GRASP-15, or in ACP; I don't think that IANA cares, but it would less surprising to have it in GRASP-15. I don't know if it's been through AUTH48, I suspect not? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
