On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:56:39PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> RFC7915 obsoletes 6145, and there is also both:
That's the one i had used already in static-connectivity-05 as the primary
reference.
> RFC7756:Stateless IP/ICMP Translation for IPv6 Internet Data Center
> Environments (SIIT-DC): Dual Translation Mode
>
> but specifically: rfc7755
> SIIT-DC: Stateless IP/ICMP Translation for IPv6 Data Center Environments
>
> builds upon 7915. which I suggest be mentioned. They solve exactly the
> problem. (I'm a big fan...)
When i was comparing the different solutions, i found RFC7757 to be
best suited in the case of ACP because of its flexibility. Thats
what i am referring to in stable-connectivity-05. I didn't find
that RFC7755 was adding any more benefits for the ACP NAT use case.
Check out the section about NAT in stable-connectivity-05 (or -06, unchanged).
Cheers
Toerless
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
--
---
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
