Just finished one round of proof build of the public AOSP code:
here is the summary:
1.missing one _BYTE_ORDER define in bionic/arch-x86/include/machine/_types.h
--- a/libc/arch-x86/include/machine/_types.h
+++ b/libc/arch-x86/include/machine/_types.h
@@ -119,5 +119,6 @@ typedef void * __wctype_t;
/* Feature test macros */
#define __HAVE_CPUINFO
#define __HAVE_MUTEX
+#define _BYTE_ORDER _LITTLE_ENDIAN
#endif /* _I386__TYPES_H_ */
2. some problem on x86 by recent check in dalvik:
project dalvik/
diff --git a/vm/oo/Class.c b/vm/oo/Class.c
index a5d42eb..c47dff4 100644
--- a/vm/oo/Class.c
+++ b/vm/oo/Class.c
@@ -4276,13 +4276,13 @@ noverify:
*/
assert(f->byteOffset >= CLASS_SMALLEST_OFFSET);
assert((f->byteOffset & (CLASS_OFFSET_ALIGNMENT - 1)) == 0);
+#define CLASS_BIT_SHIFT_COUNT(byteOffset) (((unsigned int)(byteOffset) -
CLASS_SMALLEST_OFFSET) / CLASS_OFFSET_ALIGNMENT)
+ if(CLASS_BIT_SHIFT_COUNT(f->byteOffset) >= CLASS_BITS_PER_WORD) {
+ clazz->refOffsets = CLASS_WALK_SUPER;
+ break;
+ }
u4 newBit = CLASS_BIT_FROM_OFFSET(f->byteOffset);
- if (newBit != 0) {
- clazz->refOffsets |= newBit;
- } else {
- clazz->refOffsets = CLASS_WALK_SUPER;
- break;
- }
+ clazz->refOffsets |= newBit;
f++;
}
}
3. applypatch depends on libmtdutils.a, which doesn't exsit on x86. so maybe
can disable it.
project build/
diff --git a/tools/applypatch/Android.mk b/tools/applypatch/Android.mk
index fe317ff..8f494b6 100644
--- a/tools/applypatch/Android.mk
+++ b/tools/applypatch/Android.mk
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
ifneq ($(TARGET_SIMULATOR),true)
+ifeq ($(TARGET_ARCH),arm)
LOCAL_PATH := $(call my-dir)
include $(CLEAR_VARS)
@@ -48,4 +49,5 @@ LOCAL_STATIC_LIBRARIES += libz
include $(BUILD_HOST_EXECUTABLE)
+endif # TARGET_ARCH == arm
endif # !TARGET_SIMULATOR
4. preloaded-classes/init.rc fixes originally known to x86.
hope it helps.
--
Chen
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Chen Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Cool. would you like to provide some more detail about the issue? Thanks.
> --
> Chen
>
>
> On 7/30/09, Chih-Wei <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The android-x86 build broken due to upstream changes (donut merged) is
>> fixed.
>> Now you can get a workable tree and enjoy Donut on x86.
>>
>> You may try to repo sync. But the changes are huge so I'm not sure
>> whether you can succeed or not. If you encounter conflicts but don't
>> know how to fix, I suggest you redo repo init and then sync a fresh
>> tree.
>>
>> Besides, wifi support has been integrated. Ath5k, ath9k modules work
>> fine. Other drivers need further testing. As always, test results are
>> welcome.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chih-Wei
>> Android-x86
>> http://code.google.com/p/android-x86/
>> >>
>>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
unsubscribe: [email protected]
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
