Let us have a beta version for god sake...
On Mar 24, 12:11 pm, roland <roland...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Totally agree, Apple just release their 3.0 SDK beta for who has
> purchased iPhone Developer Program. The final version comes in June,
> so iphone developer has 3 months to familiar the new OS and let their
> applications get all the new features. I hope all of us, who are
> interested in Android, and who wish to make fantastic application in
> Android platform could get a little bit more official information
> before every final release.
>
> On 24 mar, 09:16, tauntz <tau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I just hope that this time the release date for the official SDK will
> > be BEFORE the update hits the masses. Not like it was with the 1.1SDK
> > - it was released way after 1.1 was released to end-users (the
> > argument from Google was something in the lines of "Hey, this is a
> > small release with no mayor changes so don't whine that you get it so
> > late"). Maybe I'm the only one who thinks that this is ridiculous..
> > One of the reasons why we don't have the official 1.5 (orcupcakeor
> > however it will be officially called) SDK is that "It's not stable
> > enough" - fair enough but I really hope that you guys @ Google will
> > release it as soon as the code is stable enough (eg the code is tested
> > and ready to be released to the operators). That would give us a week
> > (maybe more) before the operators push it to the end-users.
>
> > And don't come with the "you can build your own SDK from the
> > opensource tree if you want" - the last releases didn't come from the
> > opensource tree so even if I wanted, i couldn't build the SDK based on
> > the code that's shipped to the end-users. And even if this release
> > will actually come from the public tree, you can't expect all app
> > developers to build their own SDK, can you? We need an official SDK -
> > and we need it as soon as the tree is stable enough (and way before
> > it's pushed to the carriers/end-users)
>
> > Tauno
>
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:38 AM, AndroidApp <zl25dre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Not if you stay anonymous (hint, hint) ;-)
>
> > > On Mar 23, 7:58 pm, Anonymous Anonymous <firewallbr...@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >> " Someone from Google? " makes it official i guess :D
>
> > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:47 AM, AndroidApp <zl25dre...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> > Can someone capable just compile the SDK and post it online for
> > >> > everyone? Someone from Google? I dont really care if it's not
> > >> > official, i just dont want to download the source tree just to build
> > >> > the SDK, plus i need to do the tricks you mentioned to make it work on
> > >> > windows.
>
> > >> > On Mar 23, 1:11 pm, Marco Nelissen <marc...@android.com> wrote:
> > >> > > I certainly hope there aren't "a lot" of applications that use
> > >> > > reflection and private APIs.
>
> > >> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:59 AM, zl25drexel <zl25dre...@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
>
> > >> > > >Cupcakeis coming, and as you know it will break a lot of apps in the
> > >> > > > market, those that use reflection & private api. So where is the
> > >> > > >CupcakeSDK/emulator for us to try our apps?
>
> > >> > > > I know we can download the source codes and build it, and I know
> > >> > > > apps
> > >> > > > wont break if they dont use undocumented api, blah blah blah, but
> > >> > > > we
> > >> > > > should get an official SDK/emulator forcupcake, dont you think,
> > >> > > > google?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
