Don't feed the trolls.

On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Al Sutton <a...@funkyandroid.com> wrote:

>
> Justin,
>
> This group isn't run just for your benefit and so I'm not sure why you
> think you should be the one to decide what is and isn't on-topic.
>
> In the 2 days you've been part of the group I've seen two people tell
> you your posts are not welcomed, so maybe you should take the hint, sit
> back, and use the delete button instead of the reply button to topics
> you don't want to read.
>
> As I said before, the Google engineers speak up when we're straying from
> the beaten path, and those requests are respected, but I'm afraid you
> haven't earned the respect we show them and so I would suggest you
> accept that fact that this list isn't run the way you think it should be.
>
> Al.
>
> Justin Allen Jaynes wrote:
> > Al, and all who share his sentiments,
> >
> > I am from Idaho and I am new to THIS list.  But it doesn't mean I
> > haven't spend a lot of time READING this forum, and in other developer
> > forums as well.  I understand how they work and that there are rules,
> > which, when followed, significantly improve the quality of the content.
> >
> > I can understand your resistance to begin complying with the rules.
> > Approximately half of your posts are off topic. However, if you were to
> > move such conversations to the android-discuss group, your relevant and
> > useful dialog there would encourage others to move to that forum as
> > well, when they wish to discuss non-development subjects.  It would
> > improve both forums, to separate the content by topic, would it not?
> >
> > You are right.  This discussion does add traffic to the group.  But if
> > reminding the users of the group of it's clearly defined usages cuts
> > just 20 illegitimate emails out of the list daily, a few posts like this
> > are worth it.  I think the majority of this groups subscribers would
> agree.
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > Al Sutton wrote:
> >
> >> Justin,
> >>
> >> Whilst it's nice to see new people on the list, it's probably best to
> >> get a feel for how the list works rather than trying to wade in with
> >> how you think the world should work because all you're doing at the
> >> moment is getting yourself on peoples auto-trash lists.
> >>
> >> The Google engineers chip in when they feel we're straying from the
> >> path and we all respect their views because they have a genuine
> >> undeniable interest in seeing this community developer. If you compare
> >> this to what we know of you, which is that you are a little known
> >> developer from Idaho whose first post was less than a day ago, you can
> >> hopefully see why those of us who have been trying to help build this
> >> community for a while now may not see your opinion as worthy of a
> >> similar level of respect.
> >>
> >> Now, as this has gotten off topic, I'm sure you wouldn't want to reply
> >> here, would you?
> >>
> >> Al.
> >>
> >> Justin Allen Jaynes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Stoyan,
> >>>
> >>> While I thank you for informing me of two OTHER choices, I prefer to
> >>> continue to inform people ABOUT the charter so they will read it.  It
> >>> isn't too much to ask that people use the right forum for the right
> >>> discussion.
> >>>
> >>> This IS a DEVELOPER forum:
> >>>
> >>> "You're now an experienced Android application developer. You've
> grasped
> >>> the basics of Android app development, you're comfortable using the
> SDK,
> >>> now you want to move to advanced topics. Get help here with
> >>> troubleshooting applications, advice on implementation, and strategies
> >>> for improving your application's performance and user experience. This
> >>> is the not the right place to discuss user issues (use android-discuss
> >>> for that) or beginner questions with the Android SDK (use
> >>> android-beginners for that)."
> >>>
> >>> There IS an appropriate forum for "water-cooler" talk.  It is not here.
> >>> It is at android-disc...@googlegroups.com
> >>>
> >>> http://developer.android.com/community
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Stoyan Damov wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Justin, calm down, it's your 5th or so message "aaargh, this is a
> >>>> DEVELPER forum" - it's starting to piss me off, at least fix the typo
> >>>> :P
> >>>>
> >>>> If you think that more than 5% of all posters on this list have read
> >>>> the group charter you're fooling yourself.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've said it once - this is the only developer-oriented list (not to
> >>>> be confused with "development-oriented" or
> >>>> "SDK-questions-only-oriented" list, no matter what Google are
> >>>> thinking), so there *will* be such questions. If you don't think a
> >>>> post appropriate you have 2 choices:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. If you're a moderator, delete the message
> >>>> 2. If you're a mere mortal like us, just mute the post (if using
> Gmail)
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Justin Allen Jaynes <
> jus...@ragblue.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Actually, it is off topic and should not be here.  Android-discuss
> would
> >>>>> be okay, though.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a DEVELPER forum.  Please keep to DEVELOPMENT topic.  A quote
> >>>>> from the official description of the forum:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "This is the not the right place to discuss user issues (use
> >>>>> android-discuss for that)."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For a full description of the PROPER use of this form, and of the
> >>>>> android-discuss form, go to
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://developer.android.com/community
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sena Gbeckor-Kove wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Personally I don't think its an issue. I think it should stay in
> here
> >>>>>> and android-discuss unless there is already a place for it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> S
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 4 Mar 2009, at 17:24, John Lauricella wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is it possible to start a new discussion group for folks who
> promote
> >>>>>>> their own products that compete with the Android Market, so we
> don't
> >>>>>>> get this constant conflict-of-interest commentary on how bad the
> >>>>>>> Google system is...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:38:49 +0000
> >>>>>>>> From: a...@funkyandroid.com <mailto:a...@funkyandroid.com>
> >>>>>>>> To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:android-developers@googlegroups.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Subject: [android-developers] Re: (OT) Is the combination of
> Android
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Market and Google Checkout a joke?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm getting more and more tempted to open up paid-for apps on
> >>>>>>>> AndAppStore where all payments go directly to the developers
> account so
> >>>>>>>> they can set the T&Cs.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Would this be something people would be interested in?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Al.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Semprebon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It would be nice if some other pricing models were available (for
> >>>>>>>>> example, subscriptions), but I just don't see a "no returns" or
> even a
> >>>>>>>>> "no returns after 1 hour" model being very popular with users. I
> may
> >>>>>>>>> be wrong, but I don't think most people see these products as
> >>>>>>>>> consumables in the same way you do.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 2, 11:41 pm, madcoder <paperga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I believe there should be demos and full apps in the market. It
> >>>>>>>>>> shouldn't be too hard to do. If the user downloads the lite
> version
> >>>>>>>>>> then buys the regular version, there should be a 1-2 hour refund
> >>>>>>>>>> window (in case it doesn't work as promised). This is much
> better
> >>>>>>>>>> than the 48 hours refund policy that allows people to have their
> cake
> >>>>>>>>>> and not pay for it too.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I really wish Google would address this. They can look forward
> to a
> >>>>>>>>>> very lackluster market if they don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ======
> >>>>>>>> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> >>>>>>>> company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> >>>>>>>> 152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> >>>>>>>> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or
> it's
> >>>>>>>> subsidiaries.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >>
> >> * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *
> >>
> >> ======
> >> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> >> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> >> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
> >>
> >> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> >> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> >> subsidiaries.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *
>
> ======
> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> subsidiaries.
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to